- Home
- Texas DTPA
- What are common defenses to a Texas DTPA claim?
What are common defenses to a Texas DTPA claim?
Direct Answer
Defendants in Texas DTPA cases have several potential defenses, including that the claimant is not a 'consumer,' that no deceptive act occurred, that the claim is time-barred, that pre-suit notice was defective, that a reasonable settlement offer was rejected, or that statutory exemptions apply. The DTPA also exempts certain professionals and transactions from liability.
Rule Under Texas Law
- The claimant must qualify as a 'consumer' under § 17.45(4).
- Statutory exemptions exist for certain professionals (attorneys, physicians, etc.) under § 17.49.
- The two-year statute of limitations bars untimely claims.
- Failure to provide proper 60-day pre-suit notice limits recovery.
- Rejection of a reasonable settlement offer can limit damages and fees.
What You Must Prove
- Standing defense: the claimant is not a consumer under the DTPA.
- No violation: the conduct was not false, misleading, or deceptive.
- Causation defense: the alleged conduct did not cause the claimed damages.
- Procedural defenses: statute of limitations or notice failures.
Common Defenses
- The claimant does not qualify as a consumer under the DTPA.
- The conduct was not deceptive or was mere puffery.
- The claim is barred by the statute of limitations.
- The claimant failed to provide proper pre-suit notice.
- A professional or transactional exemption applies.
- A reasonable settlement offer was rejected and limits recovery.
- The claimant's own conduct caused their damages.
Related Texas DTPA Pages
Talk to a Texas DTPA Attorney
If you need advice on a potential Texas DTPA claim or defense, an attorney can evaluate consumer status, notice compliance, damages, and available defenses based on your facts.
Schedule a Consultation